SMARTinez Tech
As AI-powered technologies gain traction in product development, understanding how AI apps diverge from standard apps in the user journey is crucial. The interaction models, personalization, and continuous learning aspects of AI fundamentally alter user experiences. This article delves into the core differences between AI apps and standard apps, from onboarding to data privacy, offering insights to help product managers and developers design more intelligent, adaptive products.
AI-powered apps often require a more extensive onboarding process compared to standard apps. Because AI apps offer advanced features that adapt based on user behavior, users need clear guidance on how to interact with these capabilities. Tutorials in AI apps frequently explain how data provided by users helps the AI refine its recommendations or predictions over time.
One unique challenge AI apps face during onboarding is managing user expectations around natural language interfaces. Many users are accustomed to interacting with applications through strict sets of commands or predefined input fields, where the interactions are clear-cut and predictable. In contrast, AI apps—particularly those leveraging natural language processing (NLP)—allow users to communicate more freely, creating opportunities for more fluid and intuitive interactions. However, this flexibility can also lead to confusion, frustration, and even distrust.
Users may often feel overwhelmed by the ambiguity of AI interfaces, uncertain about how to phrase requests or worried that the AI might not fully grasp their intent. While AI-powered assistants like Google Assistant, Amazon Alexa, and Siri are designed to interpret a wide range of natural language inputs, they still frequently misunderstand commands, leading to incorrect responses or actions. This misunderstanding is not isolated to Siri—many users report frustrations with Google Assistant misinterpreting voice commands or Alexa responding inaccurately, which erodes trust in the AI’s ability to meet their needs.
As a result, many users are hesitant to rely on these AI apps for critical tasks, opting instead for more predictable, manual interactions. This lack of trust can undermine the AI’s potential, preventing users from fully engaging with the adaptive features that could enhance their experience over time.
The challenge for AI-powered apps is to gradually build trust by educating users on how the AI processes natural language and improving the onboarding experience to reduce initial confusion. Over time, as users become more accustomed to treating AI apps as they would human assistants—trusting that the app will understand them even when commands aren’t perfectly phrased—this hesitancy may decrease. However, at present, onboarding must emphasize not only how to interact with the AI but also how to set realistic expectations for its limitations.
For example, an AI-powered virtual assistant like Google Assistant might guide users on the types of voice commands it can understand and how those commands will be refined through ongoing use. As the AI evolves with user input, the interactions can become more intuitive, but users must first be educated on how to communicate effectively with the system to avoid frustration.
In contrast, standard apps follow a more straightforward onboarding process. These apps focus on predefined functionalities, and user education revolves around static features rather than adaptive behavior. With no need for behavior-based learning, the onboarding journey is usually shorter, with users simply being shown how to navigate features and functionalities.
An example of this can be found in an email app like Outlook, where onboarding consists primarily of introducing users to where key features are, such as composing emails or organizing folders. There’s no need to explain dynamic adaptation since these apps work the same way for all users.
Personalization in AI apps is a defining characteristic, driven by machine learning algorithms that constantly analyze and learn from user behavior. Over time, AI-powered apps can adjust their recommendations and overall functionality based on individual user preferences. This creates a highly personalized user journey, where interactions become more refined as the app collects more data.
A prime example of this is Netflix, where the app’s recommendation engine analyzes your viewing habits to suggest content tailored to your interests. The more you interact with the platform, the more it learns, allowing it to fine-tune recommendations. This kind of continuous personalization creates a unique experience for every user, adapting to their tastes over time.
Standard apps, by contrast, offer limited personalization that is typically user-initiated and static. Users can select their preferences manually, but these choices do not evolve automatically based on usage patterns. Once the settings are in place, they remain unchanged unless the user decides to modify them.
For example, a weather app may allow users to choose their location preferences for weather updates, but it won’t adapt its recommendations based on how frequently users check certain forecasts or data points. The app delivers the same functionality regardless of user interaction.
AI apps are designed to foster deeper and more continuous engagement through interactive elements such as chatbots, voice assistants, and personalized notifications. These apps can initiate user interaction, anticipating user needs based on prior behavior. AI’s ability to learn from users allows it to become proactive in its engagement, providing suggestions or responses before users explicitly request them.
An example can be seen in AI-powered customer service apps that use chatbots to proactively guide users through complex issues based on previous interactions. These apps anticipate what a user might need help with, making the experience feel more tailored and responsive.
In contrast, standard apps rely entirely on user-initiated interactions. Engagement in these apps is driven by manual inputs, where users must start the interaction and the app reacts in predefined ways. There is no adaptation based on prior behavior, and interactions remain consistent regardless of how frequently the user engages with the app.
A basic task management app, for example, waits for the user to manually input tasks without suggesting potential tasks based on prior usage. The engagement remains static, offering a predictable experience every time.
One of the key challenges with AI-powered applications is their inherent unpredictability. Because AI apps learn from data patterns and user behavior, their actions or recommendations are not always based on a clear set of predefined rules. This can lead to unpredictable results that may confuse or frustrate users, especially when the AI's behavior deviates from what is expected.
Trust becomes a crucial factor here. Users need to trust that the AI understands their needs, preferences, and commands, and that the recommendations or actions it takes are in their best interest. However, when AI suggestions seem arbitrary or out of sync with user expectations, that trust can quickly erode. For example, an AI-driven investment app might recommend a stock purchase based on data the user doesn’t fully understand, causing uncertainty and hesitation in following the advice.
Building and maintaining trust with AI-powered apps requires transparency. Users need to understand why the AI makes certain decisions and what data it relies on. Clear explanations of the AI’s decision-making process can help users feel more comfortable and less skeptical, ultimately fostering a stronger relationship between the user and the app.
In contrast, standard apps follow predictable, rule-based logic. Once users understand how the app functions, they can trust that it will perform the same way each time they use it. This predictability reduces user anxiety and builds confidence in the app’s reliability.
For example, a banking app that offers straightforward functionality, like balance checks or money transfers, operates with clear and consistent rules. Users know exactly what to expect from each interaction, reducing any potential for confusion or distrust.
AI apps often have more complex error handling due to the nature of their dynamic and evolving models. When the AI makes incorrect predictions or offers irrelevant recommendations, it needs to provide users with an easy way to correct those errors. Effective AI apps include feedback loops where users can influence the system’s future behavior, helping the AI learn from its mistakes.
For example, Google Search allows users to refine their search results if the AI's initial recommendations aren’t relevant. This feedback helps Google’s algorithms improve, making future interactions more accurate. Similarly, AI-driven apps in areas like e-commerce, entertainment, or customer service may allow users to downvote poor recommendations or flag incorrect information, contributing to the app’s continuous improvement.
However, if these feedback loops are not intuitive or accessible, users may become frustrated when the AI repeatedly makes errors without any apparent way to correct them. This lack of control can further erode trust and lead to dissatisfaction with the app.
In standard apps, error handling typically focuses on resolving technical issues, such as crashes, bugs, or input errors. When users make a mistake, the app might display an error message or guide the user toward the correct action, but there’s rarely a need for continuous feedback on the app's behavior or recommendations.
For example, a calendar app might notify a user if they try to schedule an event without a required time, but it doesn’t need to refine its logic based on user preferences or feedback. The error-handling process is static and predictable, with a clear resolution path for each potential error.
AI apps rely heavily on data to improve their performance and personalize user experiences. However, this raises significant privacy and ethical concerns, particularly around data collection, storage, and usage. Users are increasingly wary of how much data AI apps collect, what it is used for, and whether it is being handled ethically. Apps that collect personal, behavioral, or sensitive data must be transparent about their practices, offering clear privacy policies and giving users control over their data.
For instance, a fitness app that uses AI to recommend workouts will gather extensive personal health data. Users must trust that their data is being stored securely, used appropriately, and not shared without consent. Additionally, AI-driven systems must address concerns around fairness and bias. If the AI's decision-making process is not properly monitored, it may unintentionally reinforce biases or offer unfair recommendations based on the data it has been trained on.
Clear communication about how the app uses data, what protections are in place, and how users can manage their privacy settings is essential to maintaining trust. Many AI apps now include data transparency features, allowing users to review, download, or delete their data as needed.
Standard apps generally collect and process much less data than AI-powered apps. These apps may only require basic user information, such as names, email addresses, or login credentials, making privacy policies much simpler. Since there’s less reliance on continuous data collection and adaptation, standard apps have fewer ethical and privacy concerns to address.
For example, a simple note-taking app might store data locally on the user’s device with minimal privacy concerns. There is no need for extensive data collection, making it easier to manage user privacy and compliance with regulations like GDPR.
One of the most significant advantages of AI-powered apps is their ability to improve over time. As the AI system processes more data and learns from user behavior, it continually refines its algorithms, leading to more accurate predictions, better personalization, and enhanced functionality. This dynamic nature of AI apps means that the user experience evolves continuously, sometimes even without the user noticing.
For example, an AI-powered language translation app like Google Translate becomes more accurate as it learns from millions of user inputs, identifying new language patterns and idioms. Updates to such apps may involve not only bug fixes or new features but also improvements in AI models, which can fundamentally change how the app interacts with users.
However, this constant evolution can sometimes lead to user confusion. If an app’s behavior changes too dramatically after an update, users may struggle to adjust. This is where transparent communication about changes in the AI’s behavior is critical. When updates occur, users should be informed about how the AI’s improvements will impact their experience and how they can make the most of new capabilities.
In contrast, updates to standard apps are generally more focused on adding new features, fixing bugs, or improving performance. The core experience remains relatively stable between updates, offering a predictable user journey. While users can benefit from new features or faster performance, the underlying functionality of the app does not fundamentally change with each update.
For instance, a file-sharing app like Dropbox may roll out updates that improve file organization or introduce collaborative features, but the basic experience of uploading and sharing files remains consistent over time. Users know what to expect with each update, and there’s little risk of confusion or adaptation challenges.
AI-powered apps must place a strong emphasis on user-centered design, considering how the AI will interact with users and adapt to their needs. Since AI apps are inherently dynamic and evolve over time, the design must account for flexibility and adaptability in user experience.
The onboarding process, as discussed earlier, is crucial in setting user expectations. Additionally, AI apps should provide clear visual and interactive cues to help users understand how the app is responding to their inputs and why certain decisions or recommendations are being made. Offering users some control over the AI’s behavior, such as adjusting preferences or providing feedback, can also help mitigate the uncertainty that comes with dynamic learning systems.
A successful AI app also considers accessibility and inclusivity. Since AI models are trained on large datasets, there’s always the risk that the AI might not perform equally well for all user groups. User-centered design should aim to reduce bias and ensure that the app delivers fair, accurate, and useful experiences for everyone.
[[divider]]
Netflix’s recommendation engine is one of the most well-known examples of AI-driven personalization in action. The platform continuously learns from users’ viewing habits, preferences, and even the time of day they watch certain content. By processing this data, Netflix provides personalized recommendations that keep users engaged and encourage longer viewing sessions. The more a user interacts with Netflix, the more refined and specific the recommendations become, offering an increasingly tailored user journey.
Spotify uses AI to deliver highly personalized music recommendations through features like Discover Weekly and Daily Mix playlists. The app tracks what users listen to, how they engage with different genres, and how frequently they interact with certain tracks or artists. It then uses this data to create dynamic playlists that reflect individual preferences. This deep personalization not only enhances user engagement but also introduces users to new content they might not have found on their own.
Google Assistant is another excellent example of AI-powered personalization. The app learns from a user's search queries, location data, calendar events, and even their smart home devices to provide tailored assistance. Over time, Google Assistant becomes more adept at predicting user needs, such as suggesting reminders based on past behavior or offering restaurant recommendations when the user is in a specific location. This continuous learning helps Google Assistant become more useful and integrated into the user’s daily routine.
In all these examples, the AI enhances personalization through continuous data collection and machine learning. However, these apps must also address the balance between offering personalized experiences and respecting user privacy, as the amount of data required for this level of personalization can be significant.
AI apps rely heavily on data and algorithms to provide personalized experiences, but this reliance raises several ethical concerns. Transparency, fairness, and accountability are key issues that must be addressed to build trust with users. Without clear communication about how AI systems function, why certain decisions are made, and how user data is used, users may feel uneasy or distrustful of AI apps.
Building transparency into AI apps means providing users with explanations of how the AI works and what it does with the data it collects. For example, AI-driven apps that make recommendations, such as Netflix or Amazon, can include features that explain why certain suggestions are made based on the user's prior interactions or preferences. Transparency helps users understand that the AI isn't acting arbitrarily, and it gives them confidence in the AI's decisions.
Another critical component of ethical AI is ensuring that the app’s algorithms are fair and unbiased. AI systems are trained on data, and if that data contains biases—such as gender, racial, or socioeconomic biases—the AI may unintentionally reinforce or amplify those biases. To prevent this, developers must ensure that the training data is representative and that the algorithms are regularly audited for fairness.
Accountability in AI is about creating mechanisms for users to provide feedback or challenge the AI's decisions. For example, if an AI-powered hiring app rejects a candidate’s application based on algorithmic analysis, the candidate should have the opportunity to understand why the decision was made and whether it can be reconsidered. Without this level of accountability, users may view AI systems as opaque and unjust.
While AI apps offer dynamic, personalized experiences, they also present unique challenges for users. Understanding these challenges—and how to overcome them—is crucial for building AI applications that users feel comfortable adopting.
AI-powered apps often operate with a level of unpredictability due to their reliance on learned behavior. This can lead to situations where the AI behaves in ways that the user didn’t expect or fully understand. For example, an AI recommendation engine might suggest content that seems out of sync with a user's usual preferences.
AI apps need to offer clear explanations when making decisions, especially when they deviate from expected behavior. This could take the form of tooltips, visual indicators, or pop-up notifications that explain the rationale behind certain actions. In doing so, users will feel more in control of the app and better understand its functionality.
Another common issue with AI apps is that users sometimes feel like they have limited control over the app's decisions or outputs. For instance, if an AI makes a prediction or recommendation that the user disagrees with, it can feel frustrating not to have an immediate way to correct it.
Incorporating robust feedback mechanisms that allow users to fine-tune the app's behavior is essential. For example, users should be able to adjust their preferences or provide input on the relevance of AI-generated suggestions, enabling the AI to learn from their corrections. This fosters a sense of collaboration between the user and the app, making the AI’s behavior more aligned with individual preferences.
Building trust with AI is difficult, particularly when users don’t fully understand how the AI arrives at its decisions. When users don’t trust that the AI is making the right choices for them, they may be hesitant to engage deeply with the app.
To address this, AI apps need to make their decision-making processes more transparent and provide users with insights into how data is used to drive those decisions. Offering customizable user settings to manage how the AI behaves can also help, allowing users to dictate the level of AI involvement and personalization they are comfortable with.
Natural language processing (NLP) is one of the most transformative technologies in AI apps, enabling more natural and conversational interactions between users and applications. By allowing users to communicate with AI using everyday language, NLP dramatically enhances engagement and accessibility.
NLP empowers AI apps like Google Assistant, Amazon Alexa, and Apple Siri to understand and respond to user commands in natural language. This is especially important in making AI more accessible to users who may not be familiar with technical commands or programming language. As a result, AI apps powered by NLP create more intuitive, seamless interactions that align more closely with how humans naturally communicate.
For example, a user can ask Google Assistant to “find the nearest coffee shop,” and the AI will understand the intent of the request, even if the phrasing varies. The same request could be phrased differently—“Where can I get coffee nearby?”—and still yield the same result, showcasing the flexibility of NLP.
One of the biggest benefits of NLP in AI apps is the ability to support conversational AI, where users can interact with the app in a more fluid, back-and-forth dialogue. This conversational flow is particularly valuable in customer service applications, where chatbots can handle a wide range of inquiries without requiring rigid, predefined inputs.
For example, an AI-driven customer service chatbot can guide users through troubleshooting issues, answering questions, and providing recommendations based on the context of the conversation. These capabilities reduce friction in user interactions, making AI apps more engaging and efficient.
Despite its benefits, NLP is not without challenges. Misunderstandings in language interpretation still occur frequently, as seen with virtual assistants like Google Assistant and Amazon Alexa. This can frustrate users when the AI doesn’t understand a command or provides an inaccurate response, especially in situations where users expect the AI to interpret nuanced requests correctly.
Improving NLP models to better grasp context, dialects, and even emotional nuances is an ongoing area of research. As these models improve, they will further enhance the overall user experience, making AI apps more powerful and reliable in processing natural language inputs.
Google Assistant is a powerful example of how AI enhances user experience through personalization, natural language processing (NLP), and continuous learning. By integrating seamlessly into users' daily lives, Google Assistant demonstrates how AI-powered apps can provide real-time assistance that adapts to individual preferences and needs.
Google Assistant is designed to learn from user interactions over time, improving its ability to predict user needs and offer relevant suggestions. For instance, by analyzing user behaviors such as location data, calendar events, and search history, Google Assistant can proactively offer reminders, suggest nearby restaurants, or notify users of traffic delays based on their typical commute.
This level of personalization means that Google Assistant becomes more useful the more a user engages with it. Over time, it refines its responses and recommendations, making it an indispensable tool for many users.
A standout feature of Google Assistant is its ability to process natural language. Users can ask questions, give commands, or make requests in everyday language, and the AI will interpret and respond appropriately. For example, users can say, "Remind me to pick up groceries at 6 PM," and Google Assistant will set the reminder without needing specific, rigid instructions.
This conversational AI allows for fluid, back-and-forth interactions. Users can follow up on a previous question or command with additional instructions, and Google Assistant will maintain context, much like a human conversation. This flexibility significantly enhances the user experience, making interactions feel more natural and intuitive.
Google Assistant constantly evolves based on new data and updates to its AI models. With each interaction, the system gathers insights into user preferences and needs, improving its ability to offer timely, relevant assistance. Moreover, Google regularly rolls out updates that enhance the AI's understanding of natural language, introduce new features, and improve overall performance.
However, like other AI apps, Google Assistant also faces challenges with misunderstandings or misinterpretations of user commands. While the AI has made significant strides in understanding complex language patterns, there are still instances where users must repeat or rephrase commands, which can be frustrating. Despite these challenges, Google Assistant remains one of the most advanced AI apps in terms of personalization, NLP, and engagement.
The user journey for AI-powered apps is vastly different from that of standard apps, primarily due to the dynamic nature of AI technologies like machine learning, natural language processing, and personalization engines. AI apps offer a continuously evolving experience, learning from user behavior and adapting to provide more personalized, relevant interactions. This stands in stark contrast to standard apps, which provide static, rule-based functionalities that remain consistent over time.
Key areas where AI apps excel include dynamic onboarding processes, personalized recommendations, proactive engagement, and real-time feedback loops. However, AI apps also come with unique challenges, such as unpredictability, trust issues, and the need for clear data privacy policies. Addressing these challenges requires thoughtful design, transparency, and user education.
As a Senior Technical Product Manager or Software Engineer specializing in AI and machine learning, understanding the nuances of the AI app user journey is crucial. By focusing on user education, managing trust, offering transparent AI systems, and continuously improving the AI's capabilities, you can design AI-powered apps that deliver exceptional, intelligent experiences while addressing the inherent complexities of AI.
[[divider]]
1. How do AI apps handle user feedback differently from standard apps?
AI apps use feedback loops to refine their algorithms and improve their behavior based on user input. This allows the AI to learn from mistakes or incorrect predictions, while standard apps typically only handle technical errors, like input validation.
2. What is the biggest challenge in designing AI-powered apps?
The biggest challenge is balancing personalization and transparency. While AI can offer highly tailored experiences, it requires significant data, and users need to trust that their data is being handled ethically and securely.
3. Why do AI apps feel unpredictable to users?
AI apps can feel unpredictable because they adapt based on patterns in user behavior, which may not always be transparent or explainable to the user. Unlike standard apps that follow rigid rules, AI apps' behavior can change over time as they learn.
4. How can AI-powered apps improve trust with users?
Trust can be improved by providing users with transparent explanations of how the AI makes decisions, clear data privacy policies, and giving users control over personalization settings.
5. Will AI apps eventually replace standard apps?
While AI apps offer significant advantages in personalization and adaptability, standard apps still have a place due to their predictability and simplicity. AI apps will likely become more common but may not entirely replace standard apps in all use cases.
